An Empirical Analysis of the Influence of Different Types of Metadata on the Usefulness of Online Reviews for Healthcare Businesses

Authors

  • Jiaxi Luo Midwestern State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33423/jabe.v25i2.6099

Keywords:

business, economics, healthcare rating website, online review usefulness, metadata, empirical study, predictive model

Abstract

This study aims to identify factors that influence the usefulness of online healthcare reviews and to develop a predictive model for review usefulness. A sample of 4,351 online reviews posted between October 2014 and October 2022 was analyzed using negative binomial regression and support vector regression algorithms. The results reveal that user metadata attributes related to reviewer reputation, readability, subjectivity, and containing more sentences have a significant positive influence on review helpfulness. However, reviews assigning higher star ratings to a business are perceived as less useful by healthcare consumers. The study recommends that healthcare businesses should encourage consumers to post reviews, pay attention to the opinions and concerns of high-reputation and cool patients, and use review, business, and user metadata to build effective models for predicting review usefulness. By using a predictive model like the one developed in this study, online review platforms can estimate the helpfulness of new reviews instantly.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-05

How to Cite

Luo, J. (2023). An Empirical Analysis of the Influence of Different Types of Metadata on the Usefulness of Online Reviews for Healthcare Businesses. Journal of Applied Business and Economics, 25(2). https://doi.org/10.33423/jabe.v25i2.6099

Issue

Section

Articles